Archive for the ‘Rantings’ Category

Non-coin rant

Sunday, March 22nd, 2009

Today I will post about something completely off-topic to coins.

At 9:45am my 89 year old grandmother was mugged of her purse while waiting at the bus stop (which contained her rent and avon money).  To add insult to injury, when she told the bus driver that she had been robbed, he shrugged and ignored her.  My grandmother, that has worked every day of her life and still works selling Avon, Stanley products and helping to cook for private parties (she was a head chef in Cuba prior to the revolution) was forced to ask strangers to loan her bus fare, with a promise that she would mail it to them as soon as she could.  After quite some time, a nice lady gave her the bus fare and said that she did not want it returned.

I find it incredibly disturbing.  Not only that someone would rob an elderly lady of 89, but that a bus driver would ignore her and that other people would be so callus as to not have the common decency to offer to call the police for a well dressed old lady that was clearly in shock.  With the money she was given, she managed to make her way to my mothers home in New York where my father and I drove her back to New Jersey to file a police report and check her home.  (The lowlife stole her keys as well)

What kills me is that if the lowlife gets caught, he will probably get probation and put on various social services when they should take a page from several Eastern countries and chop his hand off and leave him to pan handle in the street.

Anyway, this is one of those rare ocassions where I will post one of my “rants”.  Tonight I will probably dream of packing up the apartment and moving to a place where people can still leave their front door unlocked.

Not only did she lose her property, but she lost her freedom.  For the rest of her life my grandmother will never feel safe in the neighborhood she has live in for just shy of 50 years.

Numismatic projects and life’s curveballs

Wednesday, March 4th, 2009

I have been working on several projects over the past month and have been making some progress with the Ancient Numismatic/Cultural Heritage FAQ as well as the backend “admin” site for the Journal and I have also been editing the next issue (some EXCELLENT submissions, I think that everyone will be pleased with the March issue!) 

The FAQ project is exciting and I hope to have something to share within the month.  In the meantime, you benefit from the occasional blog entry which is a FAQ subject “draft”. 

Because of the FAQ project I ask everyone to please take the opportunity to send me any corrections to any of my “cultural heritage/property” or numismatic topics/theme entries or to send me potential posts of interest that deal with cultural heritage/property and ancient numismatics. 

As for the  admin site… Hopefully it will save me a few hours per article in laying out the text, illustrations, captions and citations/footnotes.  I am NOT the most artistically inclined person and all of the nice layouts and illustrations that you have seen have taken me ten times the time it would take someone with with an ounce more of skill to finish.  Not to mention that I am still a bit clumsy when it comes to working with my HTML editor (DreamWeaver)

Of course, life likes to throw you a curve-ball every now and then to keep us on our toes.  The past two weeks has been one visit after another to hospitals and doctors.  Between my wife being eight months pregnant and some recent health issues of hers and my own, we have come to know our doctors rather well.  All is well, but today certainly was a bit on the scary side- Erica (my wife) was having contractions and was hospitalized until late this evening.  Turns out she has gallstones.

Why am I sharing all of this? Well, I beg the indulgence of my friends, customers and everyone else if I am a little slow at responding to email or returning a call.  I also may not have the opportunity to write a blog entry daily as I have been shooting for.   Finally, I usually follow several dozen news sources and blogs a day, but may not have the time to do so.  If you run across anything that is particularly interesting please keep me in mind and shoot me an email at: delafe@imperialcoins.com.

Truth in reporting and Radical Archaeologists

Wednesday, February 25th, 2009

Earlier today I read on Paul Barford’s blog an entry entitled “Human body parts – price on request” which stated that Sue McGovern of Sands of Time Ancient Art was selling a “barbarously lopped-off foot of a human cadaver” via her website.  Obviously I was startled that such an item would be sold via an internet website, but decided to do a little fact checking of my own, because Sue tends to be a fairly responsible dealer and is well respected in the “online world”.

The site that Barford wrote about was NOT OFFICIALLY “live”.  He read about it on the AncientArtifacts Yahoo discussion list where Sue wrote: “There are a number of images missing from descriptions, that I know about, and we are using an old copy of the database so pieces that have sold are back as being available so please ignore this also.  For those that wish to play – order anything you wish – it will be ignored as this is a test database.” (emphasis added).  In following up with Sue, she confirmed that “…made it very clear this morning that the link was to a test site with test data.   The email was only sent to the ancientartifacts group, not my full client list.” (Pers. comm.) 

If you look at the item which Paul Barford wrote about, the CORRECT data for the ACTUAL item offered via the internet has been entered along with its photograph.  It is in fact an Egyptian foot, but it is WOOD.  Photograph to boot: http://www.sotantiquities.com/proddetail.asp?prod=EM806

While Paul is not a reporter, he has made himself into a journalist of sorts with his blog entries and his writing for SAFECorner.  It is incredibly irresponsible to report something just for “shock value” without checking the facts, especially when those facts were right there in the same request for testing of the website where he “found” the link and when a reply from Sue took all of an hour to be received. 

Generally, I stay away from the tabloids and may pick one up to scan through when I am at the supermarket checkout counter just for giggles.  But when articles are published in such a sensational matter, that they are so incredibly ridiculous that they can be classified as fiction, anything written that MAY have the ring of truth must also be scrutinized very carefully.  I have moved Paul Barford’s blog in my RSS newsreader from the “Cultural Heritage” category to the “Comics” category.  His entries now show up after my daily dose of Dilbert, where they belong.Finally, for completeness sake, the sale of a 3500 year old Egyptian mummy part is VERY different from the sale of Native American body parts and Paul knows it.  Even archaeologists recognize this difference.  On the The Cultural Property and Archaeology Law Blog there is a link to a paper (work in progress) titled: “Ethical Issues in Cultural Property Law Pertaining to Indigenous Peoples” by Kimberly L. Alderman, which discusses some of the “differences”. (Paper cited as an example that Archaeologists view such issues as “different”, not that I agree with everything written in this paper, in all fairness, I have not finished “digesting” what I have read, nor have I given it the attention it deserves, but it certainly looks VERY interesting)

 

Such items as mummies, mummy parts and other ancient artifacts are in fact, part of old collections throughout the world.  When these collections are acquired, it is important that these items be treated with respect.    Such items generally are sold discretely and to institutions whenever possible.

Cultural property and rights of ownership

Thursday, February 19th, 2009

There is a story buzzing today about an auction to be held in New York where some artifacts that once belonged to Mahatma Gandhi or to be sold at auction.  This whole issue certainly brings up some interesting points.

First, the items being auctions are not ancient.  But what is interesting is that many have been calling for intervention!  While I certainly agree that these items belong in a museum, laws which permit the confiscation of personal property for the “greater good” are a very slippery slope. 

Can it possibly happen here in the United States?  If you would have asked me prior to 2005, when the Supreme Court decision in the case of Kelo v. City of New London was decided in favor of the City, I would have said ABSOLUTELY NOT.  But with a few pen strokes the US Supreme court expanded the definition of Eminent Domain to include that the government (City, State or Federal) could take someones personal property (providing them with “compensation” of the “value” of the property) and give it to someone else if it benefited the government.  (In the case of the City of New London it provided more tax revenue).  Prior to this, eminent domain was interpreted narrowly to include the taking of personal property (land) in the case that it was needed for such things as infrastructure (a highway, road, etc.).  It is yet to be seen how this will ultimately work itself out, but one thing is certain, it inspired swift action by many Cities and States across the country which quickly set about creating local laws restricting the use of eminent domain.  (Other Cities quickly tried to use this new interpretation of the eminent domain laws to snatch up property for various reasons- in New York City it is currently being put to the test in the case of a new Columbia University campus.)

While on a case by case basis it is easy for someone to see the benefit of such laws, when you look at the “big picture” it opens the door to the erosion of our personal liberties.  I certainly would like to see Gandhi’s glasses and leather slippers in a museum, but not at the cost of our rights.  The arguments being made say that Gandhi would not be in consonance with Gandhi’s values.  But Gandhi is best known as a champion of independence and inspired his generation and generations to come to “fight” for civil rights and freedom across the world.

Where do all the coins lost or stolen from the US Mail go?

Wednesday, February 18th, 2009

On June 19th 2007 I had a VERY bad day.  I received a package from one of my colleagues that was cataloguing a group of coins for me and it arrived empty.  The thing is, there was supposed to be roughly $15,000 in coins (my cost) in the package.

Someone had slit the package, removed the contents and put some white tape over the slit.  Unfortunately the package was not insured and was not sent via Registered Mail (first and LAST time we make that mistake).

It does not take much of an imagination to guess what my reaction was.  First I got sick to my stomach, next I ran down to the Post Office and spoke to one of the managers.  Long story short, I made my way down to the Postal Inspectors office where I filed a report and figured I would never see my coins again. 

Something unexpected happened though.  Several months later I receive a call from the Agent in charge of my case, asking me if I could identify my coins.  Someone called and reported that they had received coins with my website address on them and when he went to the site, the photos of the coins on the site were the coins in his possession.  Did he buy them from some guy off of the street?  Or off of an online auction?  Nope.  He purchased them from the United States Postal Service.

Yup.  The Postal Service is in the business of “fencing” stolen or lost goods on a regular basis.  (I say it this way because in MY case they CLEARLY could have identified the actual owner and should have per their own rules- thus, they “fenced” stolen goods)  There is a little known department in the Postal Service named the Mail Recovery Center.  The Mail Recovery Center is responsible for finding the owners of lost mail and if they can not find the owners they sell it at an auction in Atlanta.  They are SUPPOSED to check the contents for contact information and check reports for thefts or those nifty forms you fill out when you lose a package.  Obviously they do not do their job very well, I had not only filed a report at the Post Office, but I also had a criminal case open for the theft.  What was even better is that most of the coins in the package had my filps in them with my web address and telephone number. 

The best that could be determined from the records they had and what we pieced together, someone in one of the centers that handles Priority Mail cut open the package to steal, freaked out when he realized how valuable it was and tossed the contents behind a machine.  A few months later someone finds it and throws it in a bin where it ends up at the Recovery Center.

Eventually I got back about 80% of my coins.  Because I had filed a report that they were stolen, they had to make good with the guy that purchased them at the auction, because they were STOLEN GOODS.  But it ended there.  The USPS had no obligation to make good on what was not recovered so I received a very expensive lesson.

If you have ever lost a coin in the mail (and lately I have been losing a LOT of outgoing packages) chances are it will end up on eBay.  Yup.  Most of the people that bid on those HUGH bins of lost and/or stolen goods turn around and sell them on eBay.  What’s even better, is that if you insured the package, you basically SOLD the contents to the US Postal Service when you paid for the insurance, WHETHER OR NOT you are compensated for the loss.  (If they determine that there are grounds NOT to pay a claim, they still own the contents because of their rules)  What I found even more amazing is that the guy that called the Postal Inspector about my coins did not have to do so.  Although the coins were reported stolen, he apparently received clear title to them when he paid for the lot he won and in conversations with the inspector told him that every once in a while someone complains to eBay or the police that he is selling stolen goods, etc.

Website project, new inventory

Saturday, February 7th, 2009

The past few days have been spent planning the changes to the Journal website, additions to our http://imperialcoins.com site and dusting off some of the old tools we had.  In particular, we had an excellent “Attribution Assistant” that allowed visitors to search obverse legends of Roman Imperial coins and prior to moving to the new website format we had it developed and added the ability to search for Greek characters, allowing for searches of Roman Provincial coins.  We did not get very far with adding provincial legends, but it was tested and worked rather well.  Hopefully this will be one of the tools we will “dust off”, have developed further and put back on our site.

So far what we are working on is the “Ancient Resource Library” (translations of ancient texts), Numismatic Library (Books which are no longer protected by Copyright), Attribution Assistant and at some point we will post our collection of modern forgeries of ancient coins (We were very fortunate to have a large black cabinet loaned to us and I am in the process of photographing, cataloging and weighing/measuring over 200 coins)

What tools would YOU find useful?

We have also added a total of 61 new coins to our online inventory over the past month.  More than half of these coins are decent “budget” coins.

Outcry Over a Plan by Brandeis to Sell Its Museum’s Holdings – NYTimes.com

Wednesday, January 28th, 2009

Outcry Over a Plan by Brandeis to Sell Its Museum’s Holdings – NYTimes.com.

This mornings New York Times article clearly illustrates the financial difficulties which museums and other non-profit institutions are facing.

The economic difficulties affecting the world are not restricted to the “for profit” world.  Dozens of not-for-profit organizations have been put out of business or had their funding slashed in half by the Madoff ponzi scheme which in some cases directly affected the financial holdings of these institutions and in other cases hurt the benefactors that had so generously supported their favorite causes.  Add to this the cutting of public funding and the outlook is grim.  (Food, shelter and health take priority during times of financial crisis, and rightly so.)

In the case of Brandeis University, they intend to sell off their entire collection.   But other museums and institutions could “weather the financial storm” by de-accessing some of their holdings which would never see the light of day because, quite frankly, they do not make interesting public displays nor are they needed for research.

Ancient Coin Blog

Sunday, January 25th, 2009

This blog is intended for me (Alfredo De La Fe) to post updates concerning the Journal of Ancient Numismatics, post interesting news, links and updates of interest to collectors of Ancient Coins and history as well as posting the occasional rant, viewpoint or other tidbit which you may or may not find interesting.

Also, I will try to post updates when new inventory is added to my Ancient Coins  store (Imperial Coins & Artifacts, Inc.).

I am in the process of installing WordPress and TRYING to tie it in to Facebook and other “social networking” sites which I use.